Saturday, June 28, 2003

The blogosphere is alive with posting upon posting about the recent Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, including some discussion of Justice Scalia's typically bitter and sarcastic dissent. But not enough has been made, in the humble opinion of the MRJEFF3000 organization, of this passage from Scalia's, Rehnquist's and Thomas's dissent:
State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers' validation of laws based on moral choices.

That's right -- these justices, the ones George W. Bush wants more of, are worried that the Lawrence v. Texas decision strikes down state laws against masturbation.

No comments: